in the Interest of W.E.C.

OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. Introduction

A jury found that appellant C.E.’s parent-child relationship with her son, W.E.C., should be terminated, and the trial court entered judgment on the jury verdict, terminating appellant’s parental rights. In six issues, appellant contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support any of the four grounds for termination pleaded by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services' (“TDPRS”) and is legally and factually insufficient to support the finding that termination is in W.E.C.’s best interest. She also contends…