Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Mallory
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1937No. Civ. 5865PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiffs are seeking to quiet title to four mining claims situated in the county of Calaveras; the Salvator Gold Mine, the Poison Oak Quartz Mine, the Pipe Log Quartz Mine, and the Sugar Pine Mine, together with all leads and gold-hearing earth and gravel, and mineral rights appurtenant thereto.
Defendant Harry C. Mallory filed an answer and cross-complaint, alleging title in himself. From the judgment in favor of Mallory these plaintiffs appeal.
The facts developed at the trial briefly are, that for many years prior to March 5, 1932, F. R. Clarke, deceased husband of plaintiff Mae…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Madison v. Octave Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Taylor v. MiddletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crane v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Kramer v. Gladding, McBean & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- MacDonald v. Midland Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Laguna Development Co. v. McAlester Fuel Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Sampson v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.