Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 3, 1988No. CR 87-251-BUPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES M. BURNS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Monica Marie Smith’s motion to dismiss the indictment against her for excessive pretrial delay in violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA), 18 U.S.C.A.App. pp. 585-620 (1985 ed.). 1 The court relies on the affidavits and exhibits in the record and on the arguments presented in the memoranda and at the hearing on September 28, 1988. FACTS
The facts essential to defendant’s motion are not in dispute. The court makes the following findings of fact based on the uncontested affidavits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dennis Allen Brown v. Charles L. Wolff, and Richard H. Bryan, Attorney-General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Donald G. Johnson v. Alan A. Stagner, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. HutchinsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1980
- United States v. Roger Carl MolineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Richard Leslie ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lara v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- United States v. Wayde Lynn KurtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. TummoloDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
- Robert Jenkins v. James PurkettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.