Glanville v. Cannick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
In a jury trial of an action for personal injuries arising out of a collision of automobiles, verdict and judgment were for defendant; plaintiff appeals from the judgment and has noticed an appeal from the verdict.
The facts may be stated briefly. Plaintiff, who was 65 years of age, owned and operated a cocktail lounge in Long Beach. He purchased four tickets to an afternoon professional football game at the Los Angeles Coliseum and invited three friends, Leonard Hainline and a Mr. and Mrs. Swope, to attend the game as his guests. It was understood that plaintiff would provide transportation.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Laursen v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Graf v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ahlgren v. AhlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- DeGeorge v. CrimminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Marcus v. Palm Harbor Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Workman v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.