Legal Opinion

Glanville v. Cannick

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1960No. Civ. 24220PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

In a jury trial of an action for personal injuries arising out of a collision of automobiles, verdict and judgment were for defendant; plaintiff appeals from the judgment and has noticed an appeal from the verdict.

The facts may be stated briefly. Plaintiff, who was 65 years of age, owned and operated a cocktail lounge in Long Beach. He purchased four tickets to an afternoon professional football game at the Los Angeles Coliseum and invited three friends, Leonard Hainline and a Mr. and Mrs. Swope, to attend the game as his guests. It was understood that plaintiff would provide transportation.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Laursen v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Graf v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Ahlgren v. AhlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. DeGeorge v. CrimminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Marcus v. Palm Harbor Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Workman v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API