Legal Opinion

Laursen v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1954No. Civ. 19856PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appellant’s recovery was denied by a jury in his action for property damage and personal injuries resulting from a trivehicular collision on a public highway. His grounds of appeal are errors in the admission of certain testimony and in refusing to give a requested instruction.

About 4 o’clock in the afternoon while appellant was driving east on Anaheim-Telegraph Road in a small station wagon, he was followed by respondent Kintz at a distance of about 25 feet. The latter, as employee of the Tidewater Associated Oil Company, herein referred to as Tidewater, whs driving a large flatbed truck.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Dastagir v. DastagirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. AgajanianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Schwenger v. GaitherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Ungefug v. D'AMBROSIACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Crosby v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API