Laursen v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Appellant’s recovery was denied by a jury in his action for property damage and personal injuries resulting from a trivehicular collision on a public highway. His grounds of appeal are errors in the admission of certain testimony and in refusing to give a requested instruction.
About 4 o’clock in the afternoon while appellant was driving east on Anaheim-Telegraph Road in a small station wagon, he was followed by respondent Kintz at a distance of about 25 feet. The latter, as employee of the Tidewater Associated Oil Company, herein referred to as Tidewater, whs driving a large flatbed truck.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Dastagir v. DastagirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. AgajanianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Schwenger v. GaitherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ungefug v. D'AMBROSIACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Crosby v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.