State v. Fanning
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
Appellant advances three propositions of law:
1. “It is a denial of due process of law for a trial court to overrule a motion *20to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant and permit identification testimony, when the totality of the evidence establishes that the pre-trial, pre-line-up photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
2. “The provisions of Revised Code 2945.71 et seq. are applicable to retrials, and therefore, a continuance of thirty days beyond the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. NelsonOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by1,283 opinions
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
1,278 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.