Legal Opinion

State v. Fanning

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1982No. 81-679PublishedCited by 1,283 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

Appellant advances three propositions of law:

1. “It is a denial of due process of law for a trial court to overrule a motion *20to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant and permit identification testimony, when the totality of the evidence establishes that the pre-trial, pre-line-up photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”

2. “The provisions of Revised Code 2945.71 et seq. are applicable to retrials, and therefore, a continuance of thirty days beyond the time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State v. NelsonOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by1,283 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

1,278 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API