Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2006No. ED 86995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Chad Carter (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits after an evidentiary hearing 1 . Movant claims the motion court erred because neither the plea court, nor plea counsel advised him of possible future civil commitment under Missouri’s Sexually Violent Predator Act (“SVPA”). Additionally, movant claims the judgment on his conviction for sexual misconduct involving a child by indecent exposure must be reversed because it was based upon an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. State v. BellamySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  4. State v. ShaferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elverum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Haddock v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Berry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Fujimoto v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API