Legal Opinion

Haddock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2014No. ED 99747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.

Introduction

Greg Haddock (“Haddock”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.0851 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Haddock claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because he was denied constitutionally effective assistance of counsel. Specifically, Haddock alleges that plea counsel failed to advise him that he would have to successfully complete the Section 559.1152 shock incarceration program in order to be released on probation. Because the probation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Short v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Irvin v. KempkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joshua Hackman v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Evans v. StangeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  3. Guerra-Hernandez v. RedingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. Jamie Hernandez v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Willie Ewing v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API