Legal Opinion

State v. Bellamy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 11, 2003PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wallace

The issue in this appeal is whether, prior to accepting a guilty plea relating to a fourth-degree criminal sexual contact charge, the trial court must inform defendant of the civil commitment possibilities of the New Jersey Sexually Violent Predator Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.24 to -27.38. We hold that fundamental fairness requires that prior to accepting a plea to a predicate offense, the trial court must inform a defendant of the possible consequences under the Act.

I

In the early morning of April 12, 1999, defendant, Jerry L. Bellamy, and the eighteen-year-old victim went to defendant’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. State v. CzachorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. State v. KnightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. In Re the Commitment of W.Z.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. State v. GaitanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. In Re Commitment of FisherTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. Nuñez-ValdézSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. People v. HarnettNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API