In re Minors of Davis
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The appellee-mother contends that the trial court erred in appointing counsel for the indigent appellant-grandmother for purposes of an appeal, and that, therefore, the appeal before this court should be dismissed. Appellee also argues that in a child-custody case brought under *227the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, an Ohio juvenile court may issue a writ of habeas corpus against a respondent residing in another state that has also adopted the uniform Act.
The appellant contends that since appellee has gained and pursued her adequate remedy at law, issuance of the extraordinary writ of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Clendenning v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re BursonOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Lemley v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- In re HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- McNeal v. Miami County Children's Services BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Coe v. ZieglerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987