Penrod v. State

SHIELDS, Judge.

John Penrod appeals the revocation of his probation. We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Did the trial court err in admitting the results of the ADX Abbott tests performed on Penrod's urine sample?

2. Did the admission of the test results violate Penrod's due process rights?

FACTS

In January, 1988, John Penrod pled guilty to burglary. As part of his sen tence, Penrod was placed on probation. As conditions of his probation, Penrod was required to "[rJefrain from the use of drugs and alcohol" and "if requested, ... submit to a urinalysis test." Record at 58.

On October 28, 1991, Probation Officer…