Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1988No. 86-31PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellant Nathaniel Jones, Jr., of possession of cocaine and of heroin with intent to distribute each. D.C. Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1988 Repl.). He now appeals, contending the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony by the government’s narcotics expert and in admitting rebuttal testimony about the positive results of his drug tests using the so-called EMIT system, without providing expert testimony that EMIT has general acceptance in the scientific community. He also contends the evidence was insufficient to show that he had possessed the cocaine…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Donaldson v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Brim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API