Legal Opinion

People v. Nolan

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 2002No. B149669PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

Here we hold that the Kelly/Frye test does not bar admission into evidence of an ADX Abbott Bench Analyzer (herafter sometimes ADX Abbott) urinalysis test.1

Jennifer Maxine Nolan appeals a judgment finding that she violated her probation by testing positive for drug use. The court sentenced her to serve 120 days in jail. We affirm.

Facts

Nolan pled no contest to passing a bad check (Pen. Code, § 476) in 1998. Her terms of probation required her to submit to drug testing and not to use or possess illegal drugs. In 2000 the court ordered her to participate in the drug court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. NolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API