Carter v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Defendant Jimmie Carter’s probation was revoked based on urinalysis results indicating marijuana use. The Court of Appeals found the urinalysis evidence inadmissible. Because strict evidentiary standards do not apply in probation revocation hearings, this evidence was admissible. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court.
Background
On October 16,1995, Defendant pled guilty to the charge of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated, a Class D Felony. 1 The Defendant was given a one and one half year jail sentence with all but thirty (30) days suspended.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Penrod v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Carter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stephens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Somers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- People v. NolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Reyes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.