Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1999No. 27S02-9712-CR-656PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Jimmie Carter’s probation was revoked based on urinalysis results indicating marijuana use. The Court of Appeals found the urinalysis evidence inadmissible. Because strict evidentiary standards do not apply in probation revocation hearings, this evidence was admissible. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court.

Background

On October 16,1995, Defendant pled guilty to the charge of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated, a Class D Felony. 1 The Defendant was given a one and one half year jail sentence with all but thirty (30) days suspended.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Penrod v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Carter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Somers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. People v. NolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Robinson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Reyes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API