Legal Opinion

In Re Reliant Energy ERISA Litigation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 30, 2004No. H-02-2051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ATLAS, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the Reliant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 37]. Plaintiff has responded [Doc. # 73], and the Reliant Defendants have replied [Doc. # 83]. Also pending before the Court is Defendant Ennis Knupp’s motion to dis miss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 66]. Plaintiff has responded [Doc. # 80], and Ennis Knupp has replied [Doc. # 88]. The motions have been fully briefed, 1 and are ripe for determination. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the applicable legal…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. In Re Ferro Corp. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  3. In Re Syncor ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  4. Woods v. Southern Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
  5. Kuei-I Wu v. Mamsi Life & Health InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API