Woods v. Southern Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STORY, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on the Southern Company Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint [27] and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief [58]. 1 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief [58] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. For the reasons that follow, the Southern Company Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [27] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Background
Plaintiff, a former employee of the Southern Company and a participant in the Southern Company Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”), initiated this putative class…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Goldenberg v. Indel, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- In re Lehman Bros. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.