Legal Opinion

King Athletic Goods Co. v. Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1978No. 435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Chief Justice.

In this equity action, the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia entered a final decree on February 20, 1973, directing the Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia (Authority) to pay the plaintiffs, King Athletic Goods Company and Pro Sporting Goods Company, the total sum of $67,-359.47, in payment of the sum the plaintiffs had expended in the relocation and reinstallation of machinery made necessary by the condemnation of certain real estate. On appeal, we ruled that in view of an agreement entered into by the plaintiffs and Authority, and relevant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Samango v. HobbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Policino v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. OseniderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. King Athletic Goods Co. v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. M & P Management, L.P. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Tri State Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Williams v. WadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Nunez v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. M & P Management, L.P. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API