Legal Opinion

M & P Management, L.P. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 2007No. 41 EAP 2006PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BALDWIN.

The Superior Court determined that Pa.R.C.P. 2959(a)(3), as amended in 1996 (providing that a petition to strike off or open a confessed judgment must be made within thirty days of receipt of written notice) was intended to eliminate the potential for striking off or reopening judgments after the thirty-day time period announced in the rule, regardless of whether the judgment was void, voidable or valid. A void judgment arises when the court lacks subject matter *491jurisdiction, and a judgment from a court that lacks jurisdiction cannot be made valid through the passage of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Egyptian Sands Real Estate, Inc. v. PolonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Funds for Business Growth, Inc. v. MaraldoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Penland v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Clarion, M. & P. R. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ferrick v. BianchiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. West Suburban Bank v. Advantage Financial Partners, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Driscoll, R. v. Arena, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. In Re: Sheriff's Excess Proceeds Lit. Appeal of: J. O'Hara and Finn Land Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Sharp, C. v. McQuiller, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API