Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Osenider

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1937No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

On May 2, 1927, plaintiff, a nonresident corporation, caused a summons in assumpsit to issue against defendant, and at the same time its statement of claim was filed. The summons and statement of claim were duly served on defendant personally the following day. On May 16, 1927, counsel entered appearance for defendant and obtained a rule on plaintiff to file security for costs within thirty days. The rule provided that “in default of so doing, judgment of nonsuit” would be entered against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant. Service of the rule was made on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Clarion, M. & P. R. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. York Ice MacHinery Corp. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Justice v. MeekerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Harper v. BilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oswald v. WB Public Square Associates, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Lehner v. MONTGOMERYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Triangle Building Supplies & Lumber Co. v. ZermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Tri State Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Samango v. HobbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API