Legal Opinion

People v. Raten

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree, committed on one James Lansing, and adjudged to suffer the death penalty. He moved for a new trial which was denied. From the order denying his motion for a new trial, and the judgment, he prosecutes this appeal.

Several questions were discussed on the argument arising on the instructions given by the court below, which we are called on to consider and determine.

1. The court directed the jury as follows:—

“ Upon a trial for murder the commission of the homicide by the defendant being proved, the burden of proving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Hong Ah DuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. CornettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. BruggyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. VacosUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API