People v. Herbert
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of County of Kern. Bründage, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
1. The reporter’s notes found in the transcript are not made a part of the record and can not be considered.
2. The evidence not being before us, there is nothing to show that the instruction requested by the defendant, and embodied in the bill of exceptions, had any application to the case as made.
3. There was no error in permitting the witness Thurston *546to testify to statements made by defendant before the Coroner’s jury., (People v. Curtis, 50 Cal. 95.)
4. If the Court below instructed the jury that, in order to justify the defendant, the killing of the deceased was in fact…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pueblo v. Túa CintrónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- State v. RollaMontana Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. McDonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. RatenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. TurcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.