Legal Opinion
Georgia Pacific Corporation v. County of Mendocino
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 5, 1972No. C-71 366, C-71 1722 and C-71 1723PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The three cases in which this decision on plaintiffs’ motions for Summary Judgment is rendered were related and consolidated for the purpose of the motions. For the most part, a similar factual background gives rise to identical questions of law in each matter. In each, the defendant county assessed and levied a real property tax based upon what the Assessor of the county determined to be a possessory interest in National Forest lands, situated within the county. Whatever interest…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kistner v. MillikenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Lucas v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- International Paper Co. v. County of SiskiyouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Georgia Pacific Corporation v. County of MendocinoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.