Legal Opinion
Linderkamp v. Bismarck School District No. 1
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1986No. Civ. 11234PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Louis Linderkamp, Sharon Linderkamp, and Christ Walker [hereinafter collectively referred to as “Linderkamps”] appeal from that portion of the district court judgment that denied their request for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. We affirm.
The Linderkamps commenced this action against the Bismarck Public School District [“District”] challenging the District’s practice of transferring monies from the general fund to a building fund, and its use of “judgment funding” under Section 57-15-14.2(l)(f), N.D.C.C., to levy additional taxes to pay judgments in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Percy Bland v. Robert McHannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hogan v. MusolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Vann v. DeKalb County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
- Tatten Partners, L.P. v. New Castle County Board of Assessment ReviewSuperior Court of Delaware · 1993
- L.L. Bean, Inc. v. BraceyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.