Legal Opinion

Lawley v. Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1974No. KCD 26628PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against appellant City in the amount of $15,000.00 for an injury to his foot when a 500 pound gate valve of a water main fell upon it. Plaintiff was a foreman of a two-man labor crew, and was working in a hole or pit when the gate valve fell as it was being lowered into the pit in a cable “sling” by a crane truck crew of the City.

The City makes four points, and ten sub-points. The most hotly contested issues are whether plaintiff properly pleaded or made a submissible case under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The time-honored and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Grindstaff v. J. Goldberg & Sons Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Coin v. John H. Talge Lounge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. City of Kennett v. AkersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Hughes v. HessTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bratton v. Sharp Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API