Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hess

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1943No. 8070PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

This suit, on certain vendor’s lien notes and to foreclose the lien securing the notes, was instituted by Robert Hughes, Independent Executor of the Estate of Mrs. Emma Cornell, deceased, against D. L. Hess, who had assumed the notes in question, and Noah Millsap, E. F. Richardson, and Mrs. Lela Viola Millsap Richardson. Upon trial without a jury, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the amount of the notes as against D. L. Hess, but foreclosure was denied. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 166 S. W. (2d) 718.

The vendor’s lien notes on which…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. First National Bank in Canyon v. GambleTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Grace v. Wade & MainsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Morris v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bond v. Terrell Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. First State Bank of Amarillo v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1916

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Daoran Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cadle Co. v. Butler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. Beck v. BeckTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Catlett v. CatlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API