Legal Opinion

Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 12, 1977No. 59571Published

1Opinion of the Court

550 S.W.2d 780 (1977)

Robert MEANS, Respondent,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant.

No. 59571.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

May 12, 1977.

Joel D. Monson, Anderson, Gilbert, Wolfort, Allen & Bierman, St. Louis, for appellant.

James P. Holloran, Sommers & Holloran, Inc., St. Louis, for respondent.

2Per curiam

In an opinion written by Simeone, P. J., the Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, affirmed a judgment for plaintiff and against defendant in the amount of $40,000 (the jury had returned a verdict for $65,000); but transferred the case to this court pursuant to Mo.Const. art. V, §…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Seiler; Concurrence · Finch; Concurrence · Seiler.

3Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Brown v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Shirley J. Lindsay, of the Estate of John Douglas Lindsay, Deceased v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API