Legal Opinion

Maxima Corp. v. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 6, 1990No. 696, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRITY, Judge.

This appeal involves a dispute over the provisions and implementation of a lease. The parties are 6933 Arlington Development Limited Partnership (hereinafter “Arlington”), the lessor, The Maxima Corporation (hereinafter “Maxi-ma”), an assignee of the original lessee, and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (hereinafter “Cystic”), a subtenant of Maxima. By order of March 7, 1989, the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Raker, J.) found that Maxima had breached its lease with Arlington, and ordered it to pay damages to both Arlington and Cystic. Each party raises several questions for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pahanish v. Western Trails, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Fernandez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Maxima Corp. v. 6933 Arlington Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Nicholson Air v. Board of County Commissioners of Allegany CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Ernst Home Center, Inc. v. SatoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Reisterstown Plaza Associates v. General Nutrition Center, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API