Legal Opinion

Ernst Home Center, Inc. v. Sato

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 5, 1996No. 34518-4-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*475Kennedy, A.C.J.

Following a bench trial, John Sato and Victor Loehrer1 (collectively, the landlord) appeal the determination that they breached their lease with Ernst Home Center, Inc. (Ernst), by unreasonably refusing to consent to Ernst assigning its lease of commercial space at Wheaton Mall in East Bremerton to Value Village. The landlord argues that the trial court applied an improper standard in determining whether consent was "unreasonably” withheld, that the tenant’s request for consent was premature because no formal assignment was presented to the landlord, that evidentiary errors…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. 224 Westlake, LLC v. Engstrom Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Dautel v. Heritage Home Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. White River Estates v. HiltbrunerWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. White River Estates v. HiltbrunerWashington Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API