Legal Opinion
Croucher v. Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 16, 2000No. 2:99-cv-05651PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge.
Defendant Worldwide Flight Services, Inc. (“Defendant”), moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiffs Danielle and Robert Croucher (jointly “Plaintiffs”) cross move to remand. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Defendant’s motion is granted. Plaintiffs’ cross motion is denied as moot.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
On January 31, 1999, Plaintiffs were passengers on board a Korean Air Lines (“KAL”) flight from Newark, New Jersey to Seoul, Korea. After the plane departed from Newark, Plaintiffs’ child became ill…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- O'Grady v. Bluecrest Capital Management LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- McCaskey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Cover Note B0753PC1308275000 v. Expeditors Korea Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Waters v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Dictor v. David & Simon, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.