Legal Opinion

Rode v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1992No. Civ. 92-1177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEALON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, Elizabeth and Thomas Rode, have filed a complaint against the United States (Government) alleging that plaintiff Elizabeth Rode was injured when a United States Air Force tractor trailer struck the car she was driving. She claims that her automobile was destroyed and that she has suffered severe physical and emotional consequences. The government seeks to dismiss the claim of her husband, Thomas Rode, on the ground that he had not filed a claim under the Federal Torts Claim Act as a prerequisite to establishing jurisdiction in this court. 1 For…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Eugene Landon, Cyril A. Moyer and Martin Campbell v. Bruce Hunt, Carol J. Hunt and A. Cruickshanks, IVCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. John J. Joyce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. Elizabeth Peterson, Individually and as Administratrix Prosequendum of the Estate of Frank Peterson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  2. Loper v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
  3. NMC Homecare, Inc. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Williams v. PerryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Keller v. Sierra-Cedar, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API