Legal Opinion

Keller v. Sierra-Cedar, LLC

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00013Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD C. KELLER, No. 4:22-CV-00013 Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. SIERRA-CEDAR, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION DECEMBER 5, 2023 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 provide a vehicle for deterring abuses of the legal system: imposing sanctions. But sanctions are serious business. Receiving sanctions signals a severe lack of professionalism and inflicts lasting damage to a lawyer’s credibility. So while moving for sanctions is a necessary tool to prevent injustice, such motions are not to be used as a “hardball”…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API