Bixby v. Hotchkis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.
The present action was one for the conversion of 10,703% shares of the capital stock of Fred H. Bixby Company. The action, numbered 463102 in the superior court, was instituted April 11, 1941, and at that time there were on trial two other actions brought by plaintiff, numbered 458012 and 458013, the history of which, so far as pertinent here, is stated in our decision of appeals numbered 14859 and 14860, this day filed (post, p. 375 [164 P.2d 804]), and in the opinion in Bixby v. Hotchkis, reported in 58 Cal.App.2d 445 [136 P.2d 597]. ' One of those actions was for the recovery from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Flynn v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Bixby v. HotchkisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Armstead v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. MaddoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Farm Workers of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Ryan v. WelteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955