Legal Opinion

Armstead v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1929No. Docket No. 3828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon the defendants’ appeal from an order of the trial court granting the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The action is based upon the alleged negligence of the defendant Fred C. Jackson, in driving an automobile in such a manner as to result in the death of A. IT. Armstead, the husband of the plaintiff. The verdict of the jury was in favor of the plaintiff, sustaining the allegations of the complaint as to the negligence of the defendant Fred C. Jackson, but rendered damages in favor of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. De CelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. De Gaze v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrar v. McCormickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Irons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Bixby v. HotchkisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Morgan v. NeffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API