Legal Opinion

Badella v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1955No. S. F. 19042Published

1Opinion of the Court

44 Cal.2d 81 (1955)

ELEANOR BADELLA et al., Respondents,

v.

RICHARD MILLER et al., Appellants.

S. F. No. 19042.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Feb. 11, 1955.

Cooley, Crowley & Gaither, Cooley, Crowley, Gaither, Godward, Castro & Huddleson and Frank D. Tatum, Jr., for Appellants.

Fitz-Gerald Ames, Sr., and Allen Spivock for Respondents.

CARTER, J.

By unverified complaint plaintiffs commenced an action in San Francisco for the alleged wrongful death of Philip Badella, the husband and father of plaintiffs. Named as defendants are Mr. and Mrs. Miller, Earl George and four other defendants. It is…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Harth v. Ten EyckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API