Minicozzi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In this workers’ compensation case, the claimant did not respond to an offer of modified, fight duty work, and the parties contested whether he could perform it. Michael Minicozzi (Claimant) now petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the grant of Industrial Metal Plating, Inc.’s (Employer) petition to modify, and reversing an award of litigation costs. We affirm the grant of the modification petition; however, because the Claimant successfully delayed the onset of the modification, we reverse the denial of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Waldameer Park, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Gumro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Ductmate Industries, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Dorsey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- A & J Builders, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Meadow Lakes Apartments v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.