Legal Opinion
National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 1933No. Docket No. 9086PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An application for a writ of certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission.
The undisputed facts are as follows: Respondent Stall was employed by petitioner Armstrong as a garage floorman. On September 1, 1932, while cleaning one of the automobiles stored in his employer’s garage, he found on the seat of the car what appeared to be and what he thought was a fountain pen. The article was in fact a loaded pen pistol which, while in Stall’s hand, exploded, totally destroying the sight of one of his eyes and injuring the other. An award was made to him by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- William Simpson Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Allied Properties v. John A. Blume & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- McNamara v. EmmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Thomason v. HethcockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.