Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Title Insurance v. Land Title Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1950No. Civ. 17376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Defendants have appealed from an order and judgment denying their motion for a change of the place of trial from the county of Los Angeles to the county of Riverside for the convenience of witnesses and to meet the ends of justice pursuant to section 397, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is claimed the denial of the motion constitutes an abuse of discretion.

Plaintiff filed suit against defendants to enjoin the use of business and trade secrets, the breach of agreements by defendant United Title Guaranty Company (hereinafter referred to as “United”) with plaintiff’s assignor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carr v. SternCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. ZacharyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Barnett v. United Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Nelson v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Churchill v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Minatta v. CrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Rycz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API