Legal Opinion

Pacific Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1989No. OTC 1994, 1995; SC S34924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

In this appeal from the Oregon Tax Court, taxpayer (the parent Coca-Cola Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Pacific Coca-Cola Bottling Company which is now known as “Ore-Cal Coca-Cola Bottling Co.”) 1 seeks a refund of $1,299,446.45 of corporate excise taxes paid to Oregon during the tax years 1967 through 1974. We affirm the Tax Court decision denying the refund.

In 1965, Oregon adopted the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA), ORS 314.605 to 314.670. That act prescribes a method, not the tax. The method determines how much of the taxpayer’s combined worldwide 2…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coca Cola Company v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Donald M. Drake Company v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crocker Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API