Legal Opinion

Donald M. Drake Company v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1972PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

The Department of Revenue appeals from a decree of the Tax Court which allowed plaintiff a corporate excise tax refund for each of the tax years 1965, 1966, and 1967.

The plaintiff is a general construction contractor with its principal office located in Portland. During the tax years involved, plaintiff worked on projects in Washington, California, and Oregon. For some time prior to and during 1965, 1966, and 1967 the plaintiff filed its Oregon corporate excise tax returns on the segregated basis. Under this method, the Oregon projects resulted in profits and the California projects in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Utah Construction & Mining Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Utah Construction & Mining Co. v. CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1969

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Coca Cola Company v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fisher Broadcasting, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API