Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
The Department of Revenue (department) appeals the decision of the Tax Court in favor of Twentieth Century Fox (taxpayer). There is one dispositive issue: whether the department proved that the statutory three-factor apportionment formula used to apportion income to Oregon for purposes of corporate excise taxation did not fairly represent the extent of taxpayer’s business activity in this state thus permitting the department to employ a different method.
Taxpayer produces and distributes motion pictures. Its only business activity in Oregon during the years in question was the licensing of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Donald M. Drake Company v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Donovan Construction Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Oregon Broadcasting Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by28 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Fisher Broadcasting, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Kmart Properties, Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.