Legal Opinion

United States v. Melville O'Neal Atkinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1992No. 91-30084PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Melville O’Neal Atkinson was convicted of twenty-one felony violations of the Lacey Act for his role in organizing and guiding several illegal hunting expeditions. 16 U.S.C. §§ 3372(a)(2)(A), 3372(c)(1).

At trial, the jury was required to decide whether the value of the game taken during these illegal hunts exceeded $350, the threshold for determining whether a violation constitutes- a felony under the Act. 16 U.S.C. § 3373(d)(1)(B). The jury was instructed that, in calculating the value of the game, it could consider the amount Atkinson charged his clients to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Alexander E. MarabellesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Claret EcheverryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Emma Altamirano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Thekkedajh Peethamb MenonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. John EggeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Cordae BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API