Legal Opinion
Quintanilla v. AK TUBE LLC
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 12, 2007No. 3:05 CV 7203PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant AK Tube LLC’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 35), Plaintiff Anthony B. Quintanilla’s (“Quintanilla”) opposition (Doc. 42), and Defendant’s reply (Doc. 44). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
I. Background
Quintanilla, who is of Hispanic national origin, was employed at the company now known as AK Tube from December 4, 1989 until January 5, 2004. During that time, he performed a variety of duties, working up from packaging and inspecting to his last position as production supervisor.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Muir v. CHRYSLER LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Hernandez v. ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Gethers v. HarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Bashaw v. Majestic Care of Whitehall, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Holland v. Mercy HealthDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.