Legal Opinion
Holland v. Mercy Health
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 23, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00490Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Fred W. Holland, M.D., Case No. 3:18-cv-490-JGC Plaintiff v. ORDER Mercy Health, et al., Defendants Fred W. Holland, M.D., a cardiothoracic surgeon, asserts claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, as well as additional, pendant state-law discrimination claims and claims for tortious interference with contract and with prospective business opportunity against one of his two former joint employers, Mercy Health—St. Vincent’s Medical Center (“St. Vincent”). He asserts that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.