Lockard v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas
On Motion to Reconsider' Order Remanding Cause to State Court.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, District Judge.
This case is before me on a motion for a reconsideration of an order remanding it to the state court. When the original motion was before the court, it was decided upon the case of Alabama Great Southern Railway Company v. Thompson, 200 U. S. 206, 26 Sup. Ct. 161, 50 L. Ed. 441. On the motion to reconsider, I gave this case a more careful consideration, and 1 have examined with much greater care the Thompson Case, supra, and have concluded that the action of the court in remanding this case was an error.
In the first place, an analysis of the complaint shows clearly that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. TarttCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Prince v. Illinois Cent. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Floyt v. Shenango Furnace Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1911
- Clark v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912
- Plunkett v. Gulf Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1919
- Armstrong v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1911
- McAllister v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.