Floyt v. Shenango Furnace Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
Action by Arthur Floyt against the Shenango Furnace Company and another. On motion to remand the cause to the state court.
1Opinion of the Court
AMIDON. District Judge.
This cause came on to be heard upon the motion of the plaintiff to remand the case to the state court, and was heard upon the complaint and the petition filed by the defendant Shenango Furnace Company for the removal of the cause to the federal court.
*540[1]; It appears from the complaint that the defendant Shenango Furnace Company, a foreign corporation, is engaged in operating an underground mine, and in connection therewith employed what is known as a “ladderway” leading from one level of the mine to another. The workmen were required to pass over this ladderway in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Murray v. . UsherNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Greenberg v. Whitcomb Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Drake v. HaganTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SteppU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bolstad v. Central Surety & Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Morefield v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1928
- Clark v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912
- Plunkett v. Gulf Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.