Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Prince v. Illinois Cent. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky

Decided November 21, 1899PublishedCited by 26 opinions

On Motion to Remand to State Court.

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a citizen of Kentucky, was a brakeman or switchman employed by the Illinois Central Railroad Company, and was hurt, while coupling cars for that company, at Paducah, Ky. This action to recover damages therefor was brought in the state court by the plaintiff against the railroad company, W. R. Carroll, and E. P. Smith. The railroad company is a citizen of Illinois. W. R. Carroll and E. P. Smith are citizens of Kentucky. The plaintiff’s petition shows his own relation to the railroad company at the time of the injury, which occurred while he was in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WangelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Cleary v. Ellis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Deere, Wells & Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1898

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dishon v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  2. Kelly v. Chicago & A. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1903
  3. Union Terminal Ry. Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1902
  4. State v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. State v. LoufNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API