Legal Opinion
In re Herzog
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 16, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2001 and maintains a law office in Clinton County.
Petitioner commenced this disciplinary proceeding against respondent charging him with converting funds received on behalf of his client (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [4], [5], [7]; DR 9-102 [a] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (4), (5), (7); 1200.46 (a)]), issuing a check against insufficient funds from his attorney escrow account (see DR 1-102 [a] [4], [5], [7]; DR 9-102 [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (4), (5), (7); 1200.46]), neglecting legal matters entrusted to him (see DR 6-101 [a]…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re ReulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re CroakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re ArmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008