Legal Opinion

In re Croak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in 1976. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Albany.

*872We confirm a Referee’s report insofar as it sustained seven charges of professional misconduct against respondent and did not sustain charge IV; we disaffirm the report insofar as it sustained the excessive fee charge. We have heard respondent in mitigation.

On July 2, 1998, respondent negotiated and deposited into his escrow account a tax refund check he had received on behalf of a bankruptcy client. He then withdrew his attorney fee from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re BollettieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re VohraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re CroakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API