In re Croak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in 1976. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Albany.
*872We confirm a Referee’s report insofar as it sustained seven charges of professional misconduct against respondent and did not sustain charge IV; we disaffirm the report insofar as it sustained the excessive fee charge. We have heard respondent in mitigation.
On July 2, 1998, respondent negotiated and deposited into his escrow account a tax refund check he had received on behalf of a bankruptcy client. He then withdrew his attorney fee from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re BollettieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re VohraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re CroakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001