Legal Opinion
In re Joseph
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 30, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1976. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Troy.
By petition dated August 21, 1995, petitioner Committee on Professional Standards lodged six charges of professional misconduct against respondent. The factual specifications are undisputed. We find respondent guilty of the charged professional misconduct except insofar as the charges alleging conversion and issuing checks against insufficient escrow account funds accuse him of violating the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4]), which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re DudleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re OrseckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.