In re Herzog

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2001. He resides in Clinton County.

By decision dated March 16, 2006, this Court found respondent guilty of professional misconduct and suspended him from the practice of law for two years, which suspension was stayed upon conditions (Matter of Herzog, 27 AD3d 947 [2006]). Thereafter, by decision dated October 19, 2006, we vacated respondent’s stayed suspension and suspended him for two years as a result of his failure to comply with the conditions of the stay (Matter of Herzog, 33 AD3d 1116 [2006]). Respondent remains suspended.

On February…